Friday, June 6, 2008

Bloodline coming to Bellingham, WA!

Confirmed for July 11, 12, 25, 26

Orca Theater
314 E. Holly
Bellingham, WA 98225


Dr. Ted Baehr said...

BLOODLINE is a so-called documentary which attempts to prove that Jesus Christ married Mary of Magdalene, fathered children, died on the cross, and then Mary ferried His body away to the south of France where it could be found today mummified in a hidden crypt.

The proof they offer is the supposed discovery of a small crypt that can only be accessed by a small remote camera. Inside this crypt is a mummified corpse covered in a perfectly displayed Knights Templar shroud. Somehow, remotely they cut through the shroud and have video of the corpse and even took a lock of hair, which DNA suggests that the corpse is Middle Eastern in ancestry. Viewers don’t see how they cut the shroud with a small remote video camera, nor how they plucked the hair. This proves for the viewers that the corpse is Mary Magdalene or perhaps one of her children. It is buried in this hidden crypt at the site of Father Sauniere’s church, which was the subject of THE DA VINCI CODE book and movie. In this church are many paintings and statues of Mary Magdalene which they say portray her and Jesus in a marriage ceremony and points to the secret that Jesus did not come back to life and is in fact buried next to Mary, but behind a closed off wall.

The movie provides many experts who are book authors with books to sell about the subject of the non-deity of Jesus. There is quite a bit of good, solid evidence.

The filmmakers interview Nicholas Haywood, who claims to be a spokesperson for the Priory of Sion, the secret organization that supposedly knows where Jesus’ body is and will only let out information about it a little bit at a time.

This is all very earth-shattering to Christians like myself! Viewers get to see Hammott discover many of these things on camera. The items were carried back to a house where they were examined.

The other element is that the filmmaker’s life is in danger and that his cell phone is being bugged. It makes BLOODLINE come off as a great spy movie in addition to a monumental documentary.

The filmmakers know that people die who have gotten close to this secret. They shoot much of the movie at night with flashlights and such, giving the impression that what they are doing is secret.

Also, there are quite a few people who won’t appear on camera, including a recording of a “high Vatican official” who says that the Vatican knows that Jesus’ body is in the south of France, but it’s not time yet to reveal it.

As if any of this is not amazing enough, the ending of the movie takes it to a new level. Experts and then “man on the street” interviews discuss what this discovery of Jesus’ body will mean. One expert says that it will usher in a new era of Christianity since Jesus now has gender balance, being partnered with Mary. The expert goes on to make the extravagant claim that the Holocaust would not have happened had this been our understanding of Jesus. I for one, completely agree!

Accurate statements are made that the gospels were written hundreds of years later, which has been proved to be true countless times. In fact, the best scholars now believe that all the New Testament documents were written well after 70 C.E., and that most of them were written well after that. The feminist expert goes on to say that this revelation of the non-deity of Jesus is actually the second coming of Jesus, the revelation of who He really was. An excellent observation, to be sure.

Encourage your friends to see this movie in their search for the truth about Jesus. This movie is filled with stacks of evidence that the biblical Jesus is a complete fabrication by the Church. Please pray for these filmmakers that Jesus will finally be seen as he actually was, instead of how "we" of the Christian faith demand he be portrayed for our own ends.

Dr. Ted Baehr
Founder, Christian Film & Television Commission

Anonymous said...

Thanks Ted but should I watch the film now or was that it?

Anonymous said...

So, Dr. Ted, do you buy it or not? With your "so-called" and "supposeds" and doubts as to how the shroud was breached or hair retrieved I am not sure if you agree with the findings of the film or not. I personally do believe its true and I havent even seen the film...yet.
Ron M (bloodine believer)

Anonymous said...

Could this be connected to the Secrets of Fatima? and the appearances of Mary? Many of these appearances have left certain secrets to be revealed at a later date. But in our time. This is very frightening if our lives have been a lie and a hoax. Everyone wants truthfullness in what they believe in.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Ted is one of the many film fans who is not too concerned with facts, any more than the film makers.
Besides the fraudulent "evidence" (mistakes in Sauniere's own signature, poorly written French from an educated man, etc.)is the fact that the hair supposedly being touted as Mary Magdeline's was DNA tested as being from a group of people who lived in southern France 20,000 - 30,000 years ago, not in the immediate post-BC time.
The sad part about this film is that it will be used by opponents of the Bloodline history to continue their attempts to invalidate it. Burgess & Co play right in to their hands, if they are not disinformation agents themselves.
Read real reviews of this film at: and

Juhani said...

Legends and myths are telling that Mary Magdalene and Jesus Christ had a sexual relationship, and that they would be married. This claim is a lie. This untrue legend has been borne by gnostic "gospels".